<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philosophizing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnfoleywrites.com/philosophizing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnfoleywrites.com/philosophizing</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 21:58:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: journalismgirl</title>
		<link>http://johnfoleywrites.com/philosophizing/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>journalismgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnfoleywrites.com/?p=70#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Your idea is brilliant and totally relevant to this new post modernism era. Schools can&#039;t continue to teach the same thing throughout generations because people evovle and ideas changes throughout time. What was exceptable then is considered racism now. Should the book be taken off the curriculum just because the N-word, not nessacarily. But I do agree that books taught in school should be changed to fit the ever changing mind set of our youth. Teaching the same thing will reap the same results. If we truly want change in America we must do something different and not shove racist and untasteful bull down our childrens throats because in all honesty how many kids actually take much away from those books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your idea is brilliant and totally relevant to this new post modernism era. Schools can&#8217;t continue to teach the same thing throughout generations because people evovle and ideas changes throughout time. What was exceptable then is considered racism now. Should the book be taken off the curriculum just because the N-word, not nessacarily. But I do agree that books taught in school should be changed to fit the ever changing mind set of our youth. Teaching the same thing will reap the same results. If we truly want change in America we must do something different and not shove racist and untasteful bull down our childrens throats because in all honesty how many kids actually take much away from those books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://johnfoleywrites.com/philosophizing/comment-page-1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnfoleywrites.com/?p=70#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t speak for everyone, but your suggestion doesn&#039;t bother me because I &quot;fear change.&quot; I voted for Barack. I&#039;m liberal- and open-minded. I&#039;m relatively well-read. I&#039;m not even a big fan of Twain, but I do know Huck Finn was a direct attack on racism. And most scholars would agree that Mockingbird exposed racial injustice at a critical point in the civil rights movement. Banning or censoring these books, literary tastes aside, would be a slap in the face to history.

Is the N-word completely abhorrent and inexcusable today? Yes. Do the novels you blamed condone it? No. Any sensible student, especially under the guidance of a teacher, can easily see that these books highlight the evil and injustice behind racism. Depending on their upbringing, some children may not learn these lessons without facing them in literature.

I understand your wish to bury the hatchet. I hate the word. I hate the idea. And I&#039;m not someone who thinks shouting angrily about racial injustice is the right way to go either. But I think you may have misplaced your efforts here. Censorship isn&#039;t the answer. There are some horrific passages that describe utterly immoral behavior in Homer, Virgil, the Bible, Alighieri, Faulkner, O&#039;Conner, etc. But that doesn&#039;t mean they condone that behavior, or that we should censor them.

If your aesthetic tastes differ from school reading lists (and God knows mine do), that&#039;s one bone to pick. I&#039;d much rather read Snow Falling on Cedars than Gatsby. But the censorship of racial injustice is another thing entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t speak for everyone, but your suggestion doesn&#8217;t bother me because I &#8220;fear change.&#8221; I voted for Barack. I&#8217;m liberal- and open-minded. I&#8217;m relatively well-read. I&#8217;m not even a big fan of Twain, but I do know Huck Finn was a direct attack on racism. And most scholars would agree that Mockingbird exposed racial injustice at a critical point in the civil rights movement. Banning or censoring these books, literary tastes aside, would be a slap in the face to history.</p>
<p>Is the N-word completely abhorrent and inexcusable today? Yes. Do the novels you blamed condone it? No. Any sensible student, especially under the guidance of a teacher, can easily see that these books highlight the evil and injustice behind racism. Depending on their upbringing, some children may not learn these lessons without facing them in literature.</p>
<p>I understand your wish to bury the hatchet. I hate the word. I hate the idea. And I&#8217;m not someone who thinks shouting angrily about racial injustice is the right way to go either. But I think you may have misplaced your efforts here. Censorship isn&#8217;t the answer. There are some horrific passages that describe utterly immoral behavior in Homer, Virgil, the Bible, Alighieri, Faulkner, O&#8217;Conner, etc. But that doesn&#8217;t mean they condone that behavior, or that we should censor them.</p>
<p>If your aesthetic tastes differ from school reading lists (and God knows mine do), that&#8217;s one bone to pick. I&#8217;d much rather read Snow Falling on Cedars than Gatsby. But the censorship of racial injustice is another thing entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
